Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.24 seconds)
Mandeep Kaur Sahota vs The Union Territory Of Chandigarh And ... on 25 July, 1995 cites

Ajay Hasia Etc vs Khalid Mujib Sehravardi & Ors. Etc on 13 November, 1980

A perusal of the guidelines, reproduced above, would thus clearly demonstrate that 50% of the total marks in English and Science subjects in the qualifying examination is only with regard to the institutions where the said examination alone is the basis for admission in the MBBS Course. Admittedly, a separate examination is held for admission to the institution where the petitioner applied which is CET. The contention of learned counsel is, thus, not even supported from the guidelines issued by the Medical Council of India. That apart, the apex Court as also this Court has held that the entrance test faculties the assessment of comparative talent of the candidates by application of a uniform standard and is always preferable to evaluation of comparative merit on the basis of marks obtained at the qualifying examination. This was so ruled by the apex Court for the first time in Ajay Hasia and Ors. v. Khalid Mujib Sehrawardi and Ors., (1981) SCC 722. The observations, as mentioned above, came to be made by the Supreme Court while considering the challenge of students to the entrance test and ignoring the marks obtained by them in the qualifying examination. The different standard of education adopted by various Universities in the courses, examinations, standard of marking and other factors were perhaps the basic determining factors for holding an entrance text. It was felt that in some universities courses that were followed were far easier as compared to other universities as also that standard of teaching and marking was entirely different.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 1343 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Dr. Dinesh Kumar & Ors vs Motilal Nehru Medical College ... on 1 May, 1985

It is for that precise reason that the Supreme Court in Dinesh Kumar and Ors. v. Motilal Nehru Medical College and Ors., A.I.R. 1985 S.C. 1059, ordered that no State Government or University or Medical College shall grant admission to students to fill the minimum 30% open seats not reserved on the basis of residence requirement or institutional preference for the MBBS Course or to 50% open seats not reserved on the basis of institutional preference for post graduate courses such as MD and MS and on the basis of comparison of the marks obtained by them at different qualifying examinations held by different State/Universities and that entrance examination would be open to all qualified candidates throughout the country.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 201 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1