Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (0.39 seconds)
Khushwant Kapoor(P)I(107/23/Ip) vs Harish Madan(Iffco) on 4 April, 2026 cites

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

51. This Tribunal has already assumed the monthly income of petitioner to be Rs.23,600/- at the relevant time. As far as the age of petitioner at the time of accident is concerned, as per the petitioner's driving licence Ex. PW1/7, PAN Card Ex. PW1/8 and Aadhar Card Ex. PW1/9, his date of birth is 18.11.2004. The date of accident is 26.04.2023. Hence, the age of petitioner as on the date of accident was 19 years. Therefore, in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Sarla Verma & Ors. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr.,(2009) 6 SCC 121, which has also been upheld by Digitally signed by RUCHIKA RUCHIKA SINGLA MACT No.663/2023 SINGLA Date:
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022

However, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hanumantharaju B (dead) by Lr. v. M Akram Pasha & Anr. SLP no. 2841-2842 of 2021 decided on 13.05.2025 has observed that the future prospects as provided in the Pranay Sethi case shall be payable in injury cases also. Hence, the future prospects of the petitioner shall be 40% as he was less than 40 years at the time of accident. As already discussed in the preceding para, the income of the petitioner has been taken as Rs.23,600/-. In view of the above, the loss of Income on account of functional disability is calculated as under:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1946 - J R Dua - Full Document

Kajal vs Jagdish Chand on 5 February, 2020

2026.04.04 15:56:50 +0530 15,00,000/- under these heads. Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kajal v. Jagdish Chand (2020) 4 SCC 413 was relied upon. The facts of that case were very similar to that of the present case. In that matter also, the claimant had suffered 100% disability. In the present matter, it has to be appreciated that the petitioner was a young man of 19 years when he met with the accident. The accident has rendered him immobile and bed ridden. His whole future has been destroyed. Hence, relying upon the above mentioned judgment, he is awarded a total amount of Rs. 15,00,000/- towards pain and suffering, mental and physical shock & loss of amenities to the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 241 - D Gupta - Full Document
1   2 3 Next