Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 34 (0.28 seconds)Section 81 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 82 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Section 86 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
The Representation of the People Act, 1951
Section 117 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Kuldeep Singh Pathania vs Bikram Singh Jaryal on 24 January, 2017
1. Kuldeep Singh Pathania vs. Bikram Singh Jaryal,
2017 (5) SCC 345
U.S. Sasidharan vs K. Karunakaran & Anr on 23 August, 1989
In U. S. Sasidharan vs. K. Karunakaran and another,
1990 AIR (SC) 924, the Hon'ble Supreme Court was dealing with
the video cassette which forms an integral part of the Election
Petition. Copy whereof had not been furnished to the respondent
alongwith Election Petition In the present case, the same is not
the fact obtaining situation in the present case.
M. Karunanidhi Etc vs H.V. Hande & Ors. Etc on 31 March, 1983
Moreover, the decision in M. Karunanidhi v. H. V. Hande (1983) 2
SCC 473 : (AIR 1983 SC 558), on which heavy reliance is placed
by the applicant, no way departs from the ratio laid down by the
Sahodrabai's case (supra). The aforesaid case, rests on the
ground that the document (pamphlet) was expressly referred to
in the election petition and thus became an integral part of the
same and ought to have been served on the respondent. It is,
::: Downloaded on - 26/04/2019 22:14:19 :::HCHP
15
therefore, manifest that the facts of the instant case are clearly
distinguishable from the facts of the present case.