Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.32 seconds)The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
The Companies Act, 1956
THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015
Section 65 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 101 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 102 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Svapn Constructions vs Idpl Employees Cooperative Group ... on 20 December, 2005
(41) The Hon'ble High Court in Svapn Constructions Vs Idpl
Employees Cooperative Group housing society, 127 (2006) DLT
80 observed that the sole proprietorship firm is not a legal entity,
the petition should have been filed by the sole proprietor in his
name, on behalf of his sole proprietorship firm, and not in the
name of sole proprietorship firm.
Harish Mansukhani vs Ashok Jain on 19 November, 2008
(57) As the plaintiff was under burden to prove its case for
which reliance is made on invoices Ex. PW-1/D, the plaintiff
must have, as per Sections 101 and 102 of Indian Evidence Act,
which are excerpted below for reference, the burden is on
plaintiff to prove its entitlement against invoices Ex. PW-1/D.
The Law is detailed in Harish Mansukhani Vs. Ashok Jain
(supra) also.