Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.43 seconds)
Sahib Dyal vs Pspcl And Anr on 3 November, 2025 cites

Om Prakash Shukla vs Akhilesh Kumar Shukla & Ors on 18 March, 1986

This position was reiterated by this Court in its latest judgment in Union of India v. S. Vinodh Kumar (2007) 8 SCC 100 ..The Court also referred to the judgment in Om PrakaPrakash sh Shukla v. Akhilesh Kumar Shukla 1986 Supp SCC 285, where it has been held specifically that when a candidate appears in the examination without protest and subsequently is found to be not successful in the examination, the question of entertaining the ppetition etition challenging arise...."
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 652 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

Union Of India & Others vs S. Vinodh Kumar & Others on 18 September, 2007

This position was reiterated by this Court in its latest judgment in Union of India v. S. Vinodh Kumar (2007) 8 SCC 100 ..The Court also referred to the judgment in Om PrakaPrakash sh Shukla v. Akhilesh Kumar Shukla 1986 Supp SCC 285, where it has been held specifically that when a candidate appears in the examination without protest and subsequently is found to be not successful in the examination, the question of entertaining the ppetition etition challenging arise...."
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 356 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Ramesh Chandra Shah & Ors vs Anil Joshi & Ors on 3 April, 2013

"In view of the propositions laid down in the above noted judgments, it must be held that by having taken part in the process of selection with full knowledge that the recruitment was being made under the General Rules, the respondents had waived their right to question the advertisement or the methodology adopted by the Bo Board for making selection and the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench of the High Court committed grave error by entertaining the grievance made by the respondents.""
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 434 - G S Singhvi - Full Document
1   2 Next