Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.21 seconds)
V.Selvam vs The Sub-Registrar on 25 August, 2021 cites

Sivanadiyan vs The Sub Registrar on 11 February, 2021

5. It is also the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that this Court had categorically held in the decision reported in 2021 (2) CTC 526 (Sivanadiyan Vs. Sub-Registrar, Pudukottai) and also in the Judgment of this Court in W.P.No.4535 of 2015 dated 05.03.2015 [Lakshmi Ammal Vs. the Sub Registrar, Villivakkam] that the registering Authority should not refuse to register the document on the ground that original title deed was not produced. Hence pleaded to set aside the order passed by the respondent.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 29 - V Parthiban - Full Document

Lakshmi Ammal vs The Sub-Registrar on 5 March, 2015

5. It is also the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that this Court had categorically held in the decision reported in 2021 (2) CTC 526 (Sivanadiyan Vs. Sub-Registrar, Pudukottai) and also in the Judgment of this Court in W.P.No.4535 of 2015 dated 05.03.2015 [Lakshmi Ammal Vs. the Sub Registrar, Villivakkam] that the registering Authority should not refuse to register the document on the ground that original title deed was not produced. Hence pleaded to set aside the order passed by the respondent.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 11 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document
1