Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.71 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 354C in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Budhadev Karmaskar vs State Of West Bengal on 24 August, 2011
2. This writ petition was filed espousing the case
of sex workers, in fact, this public interest
litigation filed by one Budhadev Karmaskar in
which an order was passed in 2013 in
Budhadev Karmaskar Vs. State of West
Bengal reported at 2013 (1) SCC 294 in
which the scope and purpose of the panel
considered in terms of an earlier order filed by
Budhadev Karmaskar reported at 2011 (10)
SCC 351 (Harshendra Kumar D vs.
Rebatilata Koley Etc.) was clarified, the
purpose was to lay down the conditions
conducive for sex workers to live with dignity
in accordance with the provisions of Article 21
of the Constitution of India which, however,
should not be construed as encouraging
fleshed. From time to time directions were
passed with regard to rehabilitation of the sex
workers. On 19th July, 2011 panel was
constituted by the Supreme Court under the
2
Chairmanship of Pradip Ghosh comprising
Mr. Jayanta Bhushan, Senior Counsel and
President of few organizations to get their
recommendations relating to rehabilitation of
sex workers, prevention of trafficking and
establishing conditions conducive so that sex
workers could leave with dignity. Recently,
the Supreme Court passed an order on 19th
May, 2022 (in Re: Budhadev Karmaskar) in
which following directions have been issued
relating to the rehabilitation measures in
respect of sex workers and other connected
issues. The said directions are:-
Harshendra Kumar D vs Rebatilata Koley Etc on 8 February, 2011
2. This writ petition was filed espousing the case
of sex workers, in fact, this public interest
litigation filed by one Budhadev Karmaskar in
which an order was passed in 2013 in
Budhadev Karmaskar Vs. State of West
Bengal reported at 2013 (1) SCC 294 in
which the scope and purpose of the panel
considered in terms of an earlier order filed by
Budhadev Karmaskar reported at 2011 (10)
SCC 351 (Harshendra Kumar D vs.
Rebatilata Koley Etc.) was clarified, the
purpose was to lay down the conditions
conducive for sex workers to live with dignity
in accordance with the provisions of Article 21
of the Constitution of India which, however,
should not be construed as encouraging
fleshed. From time to time directions were
passed with regard to rehabilitation of the sex
workers. On 19th July, 2011 panel was
constituted by the Supreme Court under the
2
Chairmanship of Pradip Ghosh comprising
Mr. Jayanta Bhushan, Senior Counsel and
President of few organizations to get their
recommendations relating to rehabilitation of
sex workers, prevention of trafficking and
establishing conditions conducive so that sex
workers could leave with dignity. Recently,
the Supreme Court passed an order on 19th
May, 2022 (in Re: Budhadev Karmaskar) in
which following directions have been issued
relating to the rehabilitation measures in
respect of sex workers and other connected
issues. The said directions are:-
1