Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.56 seconds)Section 19 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Specific Relief Act, 1963
Karsandas Kalidas Ghia vs Chhotalal Motichand on 10 August, 1923
23. Although so far as the Act is concerned, there is no express statement that the averment of readiness and willingness is in an Indian suit for specific performance as necessary as it always was in England (Section 24(&) is the nearest), it seems invariably to have been recognised, and, on principle, their Lordships think Lord rightly that the Indian and the English requirements in this matter are the same. See, e.g., Karsandas v. Chhotalal (1923) 25 Bom. L.R. 1037, 1050. And, with this fact in view, Section 19 of the Act becomes in the present investigation all important. The section is as follows:
Section 27 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
1