Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.22 seconds)

Bhagirath & Ors vs Delhi Administration on 16 April, 1985

In the case of Bhagirath (supra), a number of earlier decisions of the Supreme Court, including that of Sukhalal Hansada (supra), was surveyed. Provisions of Sections 52, 53(A) and (b), 57, 65 and 511. of the Penal Code as well as Sections 428, 432, 433 and 433-A of the Code were taken into consideration. It was observed that the question of setting-oil the period of detention undergone by an accused as an undertrial prisoner against the sentence of life imprisonment would arise only if an order was passed by the appropriate authority under Section 432 or Section 433 of the Code.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 64 - Y V Chandrachud - Full Document

Gopal Vinayak Godse vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 12 January, 1961

In the absence of such an order, passed generally or specially, and apart from the provisions, if any, of the relevant Jail Manual, imprisonment for life would mean imprisonment for the remainder of life, as was held in Gobind Gopal Vinayak Godse v. State of Maharashtra . It was further held that the period of detention undergone by an accused as an undertrial prisoner would be set-off against the sentence of life imprisonment imposed upon him, subject to the provision contained in Section 473-A and, provided that orders had been passed by the appropriate authority under Section 432 or Section 433 of the Code.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 227 - Full Document
1