Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.24 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
K. Devadas Kumar S/O Late K. Gopal Sriram vs A. Umesh S/O B. Monappa And Ors. on 12 June, 2006
44. Learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance
on the decisions in K Devadas Kumar Vs A Umesh and
Others1, Smt Varijakshi Bhat Vs State of Karnataka2,
1
ILR 2006 KAR 3076
2
2008 SCC Online KAR 571
Sri K N Shailesh Holla vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 January, 2020
Lalitha Holla Vs State of Karnataka3, P M Abubakar Vs
State of Karnataka and Others4, Vishu Kumar and
another Vs The ARCS and Others5 and Shri Sant Sadguru
Janardan Swami (Moingiri Maharaj) Sahakari Dugdha
Utpadak Sanstha and Another Vs State of Maharashtra
and Others6. All those decisions were rendered under the
facts and circumstances of each of the case. The position of law
applied or highlighted is not in dispute. But the peculiar facts
and circumstances of the case, do not justify the application of
the same in favour of the petitioners.
P.M.Abubakar vs State Of Karnataka & Ors on 17 November, 2016
Lalitha Holla Vs State of Karnataka3, P M Abubakar Vs
State of Karnataka and Others4, Vishu Kumar and
another Vs The ARCS and Others5 and Shri Sant Sadguru
Janardan Swami (Moingiri Maharaj) Sahakari Dugdha
Utpadak Sanstha and Another Vs State of Maharashtra
and Others6. All those decisions were rendered under the
facts and circumstances of each of the case. The position of law
applied or highlighted is not in dispute. But the peculiar facts
and circumstances of the case, do not justify the application of
the same in favour of the petitioners.
1