Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.22 seconds)Section 372 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 378 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Chhattisgarh vs M/S Sunil General Stores And Another 8 ... on 28 February, 2019
2. The above noted Criminal Appeal has been filed under section 372 Cr.P.C. challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated 24.07.2024 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge IV, Jaunpur, in Sessions Trial No. 327 of 2012 (State Vs. Sumit Kumar Gupta) (Deceased and others) under sections 498-A, 304-B and 3/4 of D.P. Act and alternate section 302/34 of I.P.C.
State Of Rajasthan vs Shera Ram @ Vishnu Dutta on 1 December, 2011
8. The appellate Court is usually reluctant to interfere with a judgment acquitting an accused on the principle that the presumption of innocence in favour of the accused is reinforced by such a judgment. The above principle has been consistently followed by the Constitutional Court while deciding appeals against acquittal by way of Article 136 of the Constitution or appeals filed under Section 378 and 386 (a) Cr.P.C. in State of M.P. Vs. Sharad Goswami,(2021) 17 SCC 783; State of Rajasthan Vs. Shera Ram, (2012) 1 SCC 602, Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade Vs. State of Maharastra, (1973) 2 SCC 793.