Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.65 seconds)The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Section 465 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The State Of Orissa vs Minaketan Patnaik on 12 December, 1952
In support of this objection reliance was also placed on the case of State of Orissa v. Minaketan, , and on the case of Superintendent & Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, Government of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar, 59 Cal WN 1042: .
Article 134 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932
Om Prakash Gupta vs State Of U. P.(With Connected Appeals) on 11 January, 1957
In view of the decision of this Court in Om Prakash Gupta's case there can be no question that the respondent could be tried for an offence under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code and the courts below were wrong in coming to the conclusion that the respondent could not be tried for that offence. The decision of the courts below in that respect must therefore be set aside and it must be held that the respondent could be tried for an offence under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code.
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The State vs Gurcharan Singh on 5 December, 1950
5. After the decision of this Court in Om Prakash Gupta v. State of U. P., , it is apparent that the law enunciated by the Punjab High Court in Gurcharan Singh's case is no longer good law. The High Court was of the opinion that since the decision of the Supreme Court was against the decision of the Punjab High Court, the appellant was entitled to a grant of a certificate to appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 134(1)(c) of the Constitution. Hence the present appeal.