Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.25 seconds)

State Of Karnataka Etc vs M/S. Pro Lab & Ors. Etc on 30 January, 2015

18. Accordingly, the orders impugned passed by respondent No.1 under Section 25A of the Act, as well as the consequential demands raised are quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the revenue to take recourse to appropriate proceedings in accordance with law to give effect to the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Pro Lab's case supra, relating to Entry 25 of VI Schedule to the Act if available under the Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 43 - Cited by 16 - A K Sikri - Full Document
1   2 Next