Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 35 (0.31 seconds)
M/S. Aretpl-At (Jv) vs M/S. Central Coalfields Limited on 28 February, 2018 cites

Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 11 November, 1974

15. It follows from the above judgment in Erusian 25 Equipment case that the decision of the State or its instrumentalities not to deal with certain persons or class of persons on account of the undesirability of entering into the contractual relationship with such persons is called blacklisting. The State can decline to enter into a contractual relationship with a person or a class of persons for a legitimate purpose. The authority of the State to blacklist a person is a necessary concomitant to the executive power of the State to carry on the trade or the business and making of contracts for any purpose, etc. There need not be any statutory grant of such power. The only legal limitation upon the exercise of such an authority is that the State is to act fairly and rationally without in any way being arbitrary-- thereby such a decision can be taken for some legitimate purpose. What is the legitimate purpose that is sought to be achieved by the State in a given case can vary depending upon various factors."
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 774 - A N Ray - Full Document

Mr. B.S.N. Joshi & Sons Ltd vs Nair Coal Services Ltd. & Ors on 31 October, 2006

In view of the judgment of "B.S.N Johsi" (supra) the past prevailing practice exercised by the respondent-CCL is also a relevant factor by which the extension of time was granted for furnishing bank guarantee having taken into consideration the fact of the case and thus, the case of the petitioner should have been considered in the factual context of the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 458 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Radha Krishna Agrawal And Ors. vs State Of Bihar And Ors. on 8 January, 1976

Reliance in this connection may be placed on the observations of this Court in Radha Krishna Agarwal v. State of Bihar. ... In case any right conferred on the citizens which is sought to be interfered, such action is subject to Article 14 of the Constitution, and must be reasonable and can be taken only upon lawful and relevant grounds of public interest. Where there is arbitrariness in State action of this type of entering or not entering into contracts, Article 14 springs up and judicial review strikes such an action down. Every action of the State executive authority must be subject to rule of law and must be informed by reason. So, whatever be the activity of the public authority, in such monopoly or semi-
Patna High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 169 - N P Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next