Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37 (0.23 seconds)

Sadanandan Bhadran vs Madhavan Sunil Kumar on 28 August, 1998

19. Mr. Keshwani has further submitted that in the case of K. Bhaskaran, , it is observed that the Provisions contained in Proviso to Section 138 are the components ingredients of the offence under Section 138 of the Act. He has further submitted that while deciding this case, the earlier binding decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sadanand's case was not brought to the notice of the Division Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 256 - M K Mukherjee - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next