Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)
Asstt. Engn., Lower Vena Canal And Ors. vs Member, Industrial Court And Ors. on 27 November, 2002 cites

Association Of Engineering Workers, ... vs A.T.V. Limited, Mumbai And Anr. on 6 November, 2001

4. Several contentions were raised on behalf of the petitioners including the contention that there was no power of review conferred on the Labour Court under the MRTU and PULP Act. It was argued that an order framing a preliminary issue was not an interim order within the meaning of Section 30(2) of the Act but it was in the nature of final order on the concerned preliminary issue. On behalf of respondent No. 3, it was contended that the order framing preliminary issue was an interim order within the meaning of Section 30(2) of the aforesaid Act and that under the proviso to Section 30(2) of the Act, the Court could, on an application on that behalf, review any interim order passed by it. It was also contended that even assuming without admitting that the order on preliminary issue could be considered to be a final order and not an interim order, yet this Court in the case of Association of Engineering Workers, Mumbai v. A.T.V. Limited Mumbai and Anr., reported in 2002(2) Mh.L.J. 419, had concluded that the powers of review could be exercised by an Industrial Court or Labour Court even against a final order.
Bombay High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 14 - P V Kakade - Full Document
1