cites: 963400

The Punjab Land Reforms Act, 1972

State of Punjab - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 1519

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 13471

Balawwa And Anr. vs Hasanabi And Ors. on 17 January, 2000

22. Similar view was expressed in yet another judgment of Honourable Apex Court reported in 2000 (9) SCC 272 in between BALAWWA AND ANOTHER Vs. HASANABI AND OTHERS. The relevant passage would run as follows : -

Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 21 - U C Banerjee - Full Document

Katikara Chintamani Dora & Ors vs Guntreddi Annamnaidu & Ors on 11 December, 1973

20. As laid down by the Honourable Apex Court reported in AIR 1974 SC 1069 in between K.C.Dora and others v. Guatareddi Annamanaidu and others. The following passage is applicable to the present case.

Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 94 - R S Sarkaria - Full Document

Gurbax Singh S/O Chanda Singh vs Financial Commissioner And Anr on 21 September, 1990

"19. ... It is true that where the special tribunal or authority acts ultra vires or illegally, the civil court has by virtue of Section 9 of the Civil Procedure Code power to interfere and set matters right. As was laid down by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Secretary of State v.Mask and Co., if the provisions of the statute have not been complied with or the statutory tribunal has not acted in confirmity with the fundamental principles of judicial procedure, the civil courts have jurisdiction to examine those cases.

Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 22 - K N Saikia - Full Document