Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.19 seconds)Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Chhattisgarh vs Suk Lal And Another 25 Fa/142/1998 ... on 11 April, 2019
1. This criminal appeal arises out of a judgment and order of conviction and sentence, dated 14.09.2007, passed by the Additional Session Judge, Fast Track Court, Court No.25, Allahabad in Session Trial Nos. 433 of 2006 (State vs. Pawan Jaiswal) and 434 of 2006 (State vs. Pawan Jaiswal), whereby the accused appellant has been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC with fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of fine he is to further undergo one year rigorous imprisonment. The accused appellant has also been convicted and sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment under section 3/25 Arms Act with fine of Rs.500/- and in default of fine he is further undergo one month rigorous imprisonment. All the sentences shall run concurrently.
Section 3 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Arms Act, 1959
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Nankaunoo vs State Of Up on 19 January, 2016
42. We are of the view that not much importance can be attached to any alleged inconsistency in recovery of firearm as it is not mandatory in every case that the recovery of firearm has to be made, nor such recovery is a condition precedent for returning a finding of guilt where the eye-witnesses account is firm and reliable. Reliance is placed upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Nankaunoo vs State Of U.P, (2016) 3 SCC 317, where the Court observed as under:-