Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.25 seconds)Abhijit Pawar vs Hemant Madhukar Nimbalkar on 14 December, 2016
8. Mr.Sugdare, learned counsel had relied upon the judgment of the
Supreme Court in Abhijit Pawar vs. Hemant Madhukar Nimbalkar and Anr. 1
he submitted that the Supreme Court held that a pure question of law can be
raised at any stage of proceedings and that non compliance with Section
33A (e) and (f) was one such objection that can be raised even at that stage.
Dipak Babaria & Anr vs State Of Gujarat & Ors on 23 January, 2014
He also relied upon the judgment of Dipak Babaria and Anr. vs. State of
Gujarat and Others2 which in paragraph 61 observed that if the statute
provides for a thing to be done in particular manner, then it has to be done
in that manner and in no other manner.
Section 33 in The Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Section 38 in The Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Section 23A in The Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
1