Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.31 seconds)
M/S Sunshine Infraheights Pvt Ltd & Ors. vs State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr. on 13 March, 2024 cites

U.P. Pollution Control Board vs M/S Mohan Meakins Ltd. And Others on 27 March, 2000

8. It is to be kept in mind that at the stage of issuing process, the learned Trial Court is mainly concerned with the allegations made in the complaint and the evidence led in support of the same. The learned Trial Court is only to be prima facie satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for proceeding against the accused person(s). The learned Trial Court is not even required to record the reasons while issuing the process. At this stage, it is not the province of the learned Trial Court to enter into a detailed discussion/analysis on the merits or demerits of the case. Reference in this regard is made to the judgments of the Supreme Court in UP Pollution Control Board v. Mohan Meakins Ltd. & Ors., (2000) 3 SCC 745 and Bhushan Kumar & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr., (2012) 5 SCC 424.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 319 - Full Document

Smt. Nagawwa vs Veeranna Shivallngappa Konjalgi on 23 April, 1976

10. Exercise of powers by the High Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is limited in its scope and can be exercised only where the Court is fully satisfied that the material produced would irrefutably rule out the charge and is of such sterling and impeccable quality that the invocation of powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the criminal proceedings is warranted. Reference is placed on the judgments of the Supreme Court in Smt.Nagawwa v. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi & Ors., (1976) 3 SCC 736; HMT Watches Ltd. v. M.A. Abida & Anr. (2015) 11 SCC 776; Rajiv Thapar & Ors. v. Madan Lal Kapoor (2013) 3 SCC 330; and, Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr. 2022 SCC OnLine SC 513
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 1869 - S M Ali - Full Document

Hmt Watches Ltd vs M.A. Abida & Anr on 19 March, 2015

10. Exercise of powers by the High Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is limited in its scope and can be exercised only where the Court is fully satisfied that the material produced would irrefutably rule out the charge and is of such sterling and impeccable quality that the invocation of powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the criminal proceedings is warranted. Reference is placed on the judgments of the Supreme Court in Smt.Nagawwa v. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi & Ors., (1976) 3 SCC 736; HMT Watches Ltd. v. M.A. Abida & Anr. (2015) 11 SCC 776; Rajiv Thapar & Ors. v. Madan Lal Kapoor (2013) 3 SCC 330; and, Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr. 2022 SCC OnLine SC 513
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 233 - P C Pant - Full Document

Rajiv Thapar & Ors vs Madan Lal Kapoor on 23 January, 2013

10. Exercise of powers by the High Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is limited in its scope and can be exercised only where the Court is fully satisfied that the material produced would irrefutably rule out the charge and is of such sterling and impeccable quality that the invocation of powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the criminal proceedings is warranted. Reference is placed on the judgments of the Supreme Court in Smt.Nagawwa v. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi & Ors., (1976) 3 SCC 736; HMT Watches Ltd. v. M.A. Abida & Anr. (2015) 11 SCC 776; Rajiv Thapar & Ors. v. Madan Lal Kapoor (2013) 3 SCC 330; and, Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr. 2022 SCC OnLine SC 513
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 781 - J S Khehar - Full Document

Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan vs The State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 April, 2022

10. Exercise of powers by the High Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is limited in its scope and can be exercised only where the Court is fully satisfied that the material produced would irrefutably rule out the charge and is of such sterling and impeccable quality that the invocation of powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the criminal proceedings is warranted. Reference is placed on the judgments of the Supreme Court in Smt.Nagawwa v. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi & Ors., (1976) 3 SCC 736; HMT Watches Ltd. v. M.A. Abida & Anr. (2015) 11 SCC 776; Rajiv Thapar & Ors. v. Madan Lal Kapoor (2013) 3 SCC 330; and, Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr. 2022 SCC OnLine SC 513
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 986 - H Roy - Full Document

State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990

In the State of Haryana & Ors. v. Bhajan Lal & Ors. 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335, the Supreme Court has cautioned that the power of quashing a criminal proceeding should be exercised very sparingly and with circumspection, and that too, in the rarest of rare cases; and that the Court will not be justified in embarking upon an inquiry as to the reliability or genuineness or otherwise of the allegations made in the complaint.
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 19733 - S R Pandian - Full Document
1   2 Next