Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.19 seconds)

Dollar Company, Madras vs Collector Of Madras on 1 May, 1975

"14................ Though the appellate court is within its right to take a different view on a question of fact, that should be done after adverting to the reasons given by the trial judge in arriving at the finding in question............. The appellate court should interfere with the judgment under appeal not because it is not right, but when it is shown to be wrong, as observed by three Judge Bench of this Court in Dollar Co. v. Collector of Madras .................
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 103 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Srimati Rani Hemanta Kumari Devi And ... vs Maharaja Jagadindra Nath Roy Bahadur on 8 January, 1920

15............. the appellate court has to bear in mind the reasons ascribed by the trial court. This view of ours finds support from what was stated by the Privy Council in Rani Hemant Kumari v. Maharaja Jagadhindra Nath (1906) 10 Cal. WN. 630, wherein while regarding the appellate judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Fort William as 'careful and able', it was stated that it did not 'come to close quarters with the judgment which it reviews, and indeed never discusses or even alludes to the reasoning of the Subordinate Judge'."
Calcutta High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 55 - Full Document
1