The State Of M.P vs Amichand Agrawal And Ors. 32 ... on 6 September, 2018
5. During cross-examination of the witness by Ld. Counsel for
the accused, PW-1 denied that at the time of incident he was minor.
He did not know the name of registered owner of said motorcycle.
He did not know whether Dheeraj Raghav was having DL at the
time of incident. He did not know whether the Ambassador car was
belonged to CISF Department. He denied that the police officials
State Vs. Manoj Kumar
FIR No. 283/14
PS Kamla Market
3/26
were checking the vehicles passing through the red light as it was
the day of 2nd October. He denied that CISF officials had got stop
them for the purpose of checking and due to avoid checking,
Dheeraj Raghav lost control over the motorcycle and as a result hit
with Ambassador car. My date of birth is 02.09.95. He denied that
at the time of incident they were influenced of liquor. He did not
know whether his father Subhash Chand had made endorsement on
his MLC by stating that they do not want any action in respect of
the accident. At that time, he was not having driving license. You
were not sitting inside the car, again said, he was inside the car. He
denied that the accident had occurred due to rash and negligent act
of Dheeraj Raghav. He denied that there was no negligent on the
part of accused Manoj. He denied that they got falsely registered
the case against the accused as the accident was occurred due to the
rash and negligent act of Dheeraj Raghav and they have
apprehension to register a case against them. He denied that he was
deposing falsely.