Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.21 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 300A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
K. R. Deb vs Collector Of Central Excise, Shillong on 7 April, 1971
15. The aforementioned judgment was later revisited and reaffirmed by the
Supreme Court in Union of India and Others v. P. Thayagarajan.2 In
this case, the Court undertook a meticulous examination of the
principles laid down in K.R. Deb (Supra) and further substantiated its
findings. The relevant excerpt is produced below:
Union Of India & Ors vs P.Thayagarajan on 24 November, 1998
15. The aforementioned judgment was later revisited and reaffirmed by the
Supreme Court in Union of India and Others v. P. Thayagarajan.2 In
this case, the Court undertook a meticulous examination of the
principles laid down in K.R. Deb (Supra) and further substantiated its
findings. The relevant excerpt is produced below:
State Of Assam & Anr vs J. N. Roy Biswas on 6 October, 1975
17. At this juncture, it would be appropriate for this Court to peruse the
Supreme Court's judgment of State of Assam and Anr. v. J.N. Roy
Biswas3 . The Supreme Court in this case, upholding the stance that the
disciplinary authority can always order fresh enquiry, held as under:
Anand Narain Shukla vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 August, 1979
18. The aforementioned precedent found further resonance in the case of
Anand Narain Shukla v. State of Madhya Pradesh.4 In this matter, the
inquiry proceedings were concluded, but upon the filing of a writ
petition, the initial inquiry was quashed. Subsequently, fresh
proceedings were initiated on the same charges, which culminated in
findings of guilt on certain counts, and appropriate punishment was
3
1975 AIR 2277.
Nahar Singh Yadav & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 19 November, 2010
In alignment with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the
aforementioned cases, the Delhi High Court, in Nahar Singh v. Union of
India and Others5 articulated a similar position and held as under:
1