Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.31 seconds)Section 47 in The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 [Entire Act]
Bhagwan Dass & Anr vs Punjab State Electricity Board on 4 January, 2008
In the light of the above matrix of facts & circumstances, it is seen that the
case of applicant falls very much within the ambit of the Judgement of
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case Bhagwan Dass & Anr vs
Punjab State Electricity Board (2008) 1 SCC 579, and also that of the
coordinate Bench of CAT in OA No. 54/2024 dated 26.07.2024. It is seen
KOMA KOMAL RANI
CAT Bangalore
2026.03.26
L RANI17:15:33+05'30'
36
OA No.170/00100/2025/CAT/BANGALORE
that gross injustice has been inflicted upon the applicant due to the failure of
the respondents to comply with the relevant provisions of DoPT OMs dated
19.05.2015 and 07.09.2020 and also the provisions of RPWD Act of 2016
and that has caused irreversible damage to the cause of the applicant. Hence,
the OA is allowed. It is hereby ordered:
Section 20 in The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 [Entire Act]
The Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection Of Rights And Full Participation) Act, 1995
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Auditor General Of India vs G.Ananta Rajeswara Rao on 8 April, 1993
1. The Hon'ble Apex Court while passing the order dated 8th April, 1993
in the case of Auditor General of India and others Vs. G. Ananta
Rajeswara Rao [(1994) 1 SSC 192] held that appointment on grounds of
KOMA KOMAL RANI
CAT Bangalore
2026.03.26
L RANI17:15:33+05'30'
12
OA No.170/00100/2025/CAT/BANGALORE
descent clearly violates Article 16(2) of the Constitution; but if the
appointment is confined to the son or daughter or widow of the Government
servant who died in harness and who needs immediate appointment on
grounds of immediate need of assistance in the event of there being no other
earning member in the family to supplement the loss of income from the
bread winner to relieve the economic distress of the members of the family,
it is unexceptionable.
Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs State Of Haryana (Sawant, J.) on 4 May, 1994
2. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in its judgement dated 4th May, 1994 in
the case of Umesh Kumar Nagpal Vs State of Haryana and others [JT
1994 (3) SC 525] has laid down the following important principles in the
matter of compassionate appointment: