Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.16 seconds)
Gautam Poly Enterprises Pvt Ltd vs Balwinder Singh And Ors on 29 September, 2016 cites

Harbans Kaur vs Amrit Singh @ Beer Singh on 31 July, 2015

Having considered the submissions made by learned For Subsequent orders see CM-18729-CII-2016 3 of 4 ::: Downloaded on - 24-10-2016 04:01:41 ::: CM No.19667-CII-2016 in/and -4- Civil Revision No. 4344 of 2016 counsel for the petitioner, I am of the view that since the sale deeds have been assailed on the basis of fraud, no possession has been claimed by the plaintiff in the suit. The defendants have admitted the case of the plaintiff in toto, therefore, on the basis of observations made by this Court in Harbans Kaur vs Amrik Singh @ Beer Singh, 2015(4) R.C.R (Civil) 770 and Surjit Singh vs Karamjit Kaur, 2012 (3) R.C.R (Civil) 364, the impugned order is set aside and revision petition is allowed.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 5 - Sabina - Full Document

P.R. T.C. Faridkot vs Paramjit Kaur And Others on 7 March, 2014

Having considered the submissions made by learned For Subsequent orders see CM-18729-CII-2016 3 of 4 ::: Downloaded on - 24-10-2016 04:01:41 ::: CM No.19667-CII-2016 in/and -4- Civil Revision No. 4344 of 2016 counsel for the petitioner, I am of the view that since the sale deeds have been assailed on the basis of fraud, no possession has been claimed by the plaintiff in the suit. The defendants have admitted the case of the plaintiff in toto, therefore, on the basis of observations made by this Court in Harbans Kaur vs Amrik Singh @ Beer Singh, 2015(4) R.C.R (Civil) 770 and Surjit Singh vs Karamjit Kaur, 2012 (3) R.C.R (Civil) 364, the impugned order is set aside and revision petition is allowed.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - K Kannan - Full Document
1