Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.32 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Zoroastrian Co-Operative Housing ... vs District Registrar Co-Operative ... on 15 April, 2005
[See Zoroastrian Coop.
Housing Society Ltd. vs. District
Registrar, Coop. Societies (Urban) &
Ors. reported in 2005 (5) SCC 632.] "
Pradeep Kumar Biswas vs Indian Institute Of Chemical Biology & ... on 16 April, 2002
In this
connection, observations made in the
case of Pradeep Kumar Biswas (supra)
quoted earlier would also be relevant."
Gayatri De vs Mousumi Cooperative Housing Society ... on 16 April, 2004
15. We are, however, not oblivious of a
three judge Bench decision in Gayatri
De vs. Mousumi Cooperative Housing
Society Ltd. & Ors. 2004 (5) SCC 90,
wherein this Court held a writ petition
to be maintainable against the
cooperative society only stating:
Bholanath Roy And Ors. vs State Of West Bengal And Ors. on 9 November, 1995
"18. We may notice in some decisions,
some High Courts have held wherein
that a writ petition would be
maintainable against a society if it is
demonstrated that any mandatory
provision of the Act or the rules framed
thereunder, have been violated by it.
[See Bholanath Roy & Ors. vs. State of
West Bengal & Ors. reported in (1996)
Vol.1 Calcutta Law Journal 502.]
Madhya Pradesh Rajya Sahakari Bank ... vs State Of M.P. & Ors on 22 February, 2007
In the case titled as Madhya Pradesh Rajya
Sahakari Bank Maryadit versus State of M.P. & Ors.,
::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 19:34:56 :::HCHP
: 10 :
reported in 2007 AIR SCW 1533, the Apex Court has held
that when it is determined that Society is not a State, then
.
Supriyo Basu And Ors vs West Bengal Housing Board And Ors on 5 August, 2005
We need not go into this aspect as in
view of the recent decision of this Act in
Supriyo Basu & Ors. v. W.B. Housing
Board & Ors., [(2005) 6 SCC 289] their
Lordships have laid down what are the
parameters for challenging the orders
passed by the Co operative Societies. It
has been held that writ would be
maintainable against a Cooperative
society if it is established that a
mandatory statutory provision of a
statute has been violated. Therefore,
nothing turns on this aspect of the
matter."
Jatya Pal Singh & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 17 April, 2013
19. The Apex Court in the case titled as Jatya Pal
Singh and Ors. versus Union of India and Ors., reported
in 2013 AIR SCW 2545, has laid down the tests how a Society
can be said to be State or instrumentality of the State,
which stand already discussed and held in S.S. Rana's case
::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 19:34:56 :::HCHP
: 11 :
(supra), applicable to the case in hand. The Apex Court has
also discussed whether a writ will lie against the company/
.
T.M.Sampath vs Secy Ministry Of Water Resources & Ors. on 8 November, 2011
20. The Apex Court in the latest judgment in the case
titled as T.M. Sampath & Ors. versus Secretary, Ministry
of Water Resources & Ors., reported in 2015 AIR SCW 998,
has also discussed the same concept and held that writ will not
lie.