Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)M/S Vikas Wsp Ltd.And Ors vs Directorate Enforcement And Anr on 16 June, 2020
2. For the purposes of considering the prayer for interim directions, the
Court notes that the judgment in Vikas WSP and Others vs. Directorate
Enforcement and Another [2020 SCC Online Del 1732] passed by a
learned Judge of the Court has clearly held that the Adjudicating Authority
would stand rendered as functus officio, once the period of 180 days expires.
Although that petition forms subject matter of challenge in LPA 362/2020,
the Division Bench there too has passed interim orders of protection. Matter
requires consideration.
Aasma Mohammed Farooq And Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 5 December, 2018
1. A preliminary objection is taken to the maintainability of the writ
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:NEHA
Signing Date:03.06.2022
19:54:58
petition with Mr. Hossain, learned counsel appearing for the Enforcement
Directorate, contending that this Court would have no jurisdiction to
entertain the present writ petitions. Insofar as W.P.(C) 6354/2022 is
concerned, it is pointed out that the parties are all residents of Bangalore and
that the principal order of attachment was also passed by an authority situate
in that State. It is further pointed out that the properties which form subject
matter of the said writ petitions are all situate in the State of Karnataka.
Placing reliance on the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in
Aasma Mohammed Farooq and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. [2018
SCC OnLine Del 12800], Mr. Hossain would submit that the said writ
petition would not be maintainable. Similar arguments are addressed in
respect of W.P.(C) 7656/2022. Mr. Hossain submits that here too the
petitioner is a company whose principal office is situate in the State of
Karnataka and that the provisional order of attachment was also made by the
competent authority situate in that State. In view of the aforesaid, it was
submitted that bearing in mind the principles of forum conveniens as were
propounded by the Division Bench of the Court in Aasma Mohammed
Farooq, the two writ petitions are liable to be dismissed on this score alone.
The attention of the Court has further been drawn to the order of 14
December 2018 in terms of which the Special Leave to Appeal taken against
the judgment rendered by the Division Bench in Aasma Mohammed
Farooq came to be disposed of with the Supreme Court observing that it
was in agreement with the view which had been expressed therein.
Vishnu Security Services vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ... on 17 February, 2012
"9. During the course of the arguments, a reference was made to the
judgment of the Coordinate Bench of this Court in Vishnu Security
Services (supra), wherein the Coordinate Bench has further explained the
judgment of the Five Judges in Sterling Agro Industries Ltd. (supra) and
has clarified in para 11 as under:--
1