Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.82 seconds)Section 2 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 135 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 29 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 134 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Peps Industries Private Limited vs Kurlon Limited on 16 March, 2020
8.6. The learned counsel also contends that the plaintiff holds several
domain names containing "PhonePe" and argues that the dominant "Pe"
element, even when registered in Devanagari script, deserves equal
protection. As the defendant has not challenged the validity of the
trademarks, the statutory assumption that the trademarks are valid must be
accepted. The learned counsel refers to judgments such as PEPS Industries
Private Limited v. Kurlon Limited to support the argument that once a
prima facie case of infringement is established, an injunction must follow.