Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.22 seconds)
Naresh Kumar S/O. Sh. Tara Chand vs M/S. Kirti Graphic on 22 August, 2014 cites

Municipal Corporation, Faridabad vs Siri Niwas on 6 September, 2004

11. ARGUMENTS I have heard Sh. Ajit Singh Adv. for the workman and Sh. G. D. Maheshwari Adv. for the management. Ld. counsel for management filed written submissions and relied upon case laws (i) Ranip Nagar Palika Vs. Babuji Gabhaji Thakare and ors. 2009 LLR SC 215; (ii) State of Maharashtra Vs. Dattatray Digamber Birajdas 2007 LLR SC 1132; (iii) Surendranagar District Panchayat & Anr. Vs. Jethabhai Pitamberbhai 2006 LLR SC 250; (iv) Municipal Corporation, Faridabad Vs. Siri Niwas 2004 LLR SC 1022; (v) Hemraj Vs. Director Sericulture, Bhopal & Anr. 2008 LLR 332; (vi) Raj Rani Vs. GTB Hospital & Anr. 2005 LLR 250; (vii) Rajasthan Tourism Development Corp. Ltd. Vs. Intejam Ali Zafri 2006 LLR 942; (viii) DGM Oil & Natural Gas Corp. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Illias Abdulrehman 2005 LLR 235; (ix) Haryana State Co­operative Supply Marketing Federation Ltd. Vs. Sanjay 2009 LLR 1014; (x) The Range Forest Officer Vs. S. T. Harimani 2002 LLR 339; (xi) Bank of Baroda, Kota Vs. PO, CGIT cum Labour Court, Kota & Anr. 2011 (1) LLJ 462 and (xii) Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Krishna Pal 2007 LLR 76 (Delhi HC).
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 410 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Rajasthan Tourism Dev. Corpn. Ltd. & Anr vs Intejam Ali Zafri on 13 July, 2006

11. ARGUMENTS I have heard Sh. Ajit Singh Adv. for the workman and Sh. G. D. Maheshwari Adv. for the management. Ld. counsel for management filed written submissions and relied upon case laws (i) Ranip Nagar Palika Vs. Babuji Gabhaji Thakare and ors. 2009 LLR SC 215; (ii) State of Maharashtra Vs. Dattatray Digamber Birajdas 2007 LLR SC 1132; (iii) Surendranagar District Panchayat & Anr. Vs. Jethabhai Pitamberbhai 2006 LLR SC 250; (iv) Municipal Corporation, Faridabad Vs. Siri Niwas 2004 LLR SC 1022; (v) Hemraj Vs. Director Sericulture, Bhopal & Anr. 2008 LLR 332; (vi) Raj Rani Vs. GTB Hospital & Anr. 2005 LLR 250; (vii) Rajasthan Tourism Development Corp. Ltd. Vs. Intejam Ali Zafri 2006 LLR 942; (viii) DGM Oil & Natural Gas Corp. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Illias Abdulrehman 2005 LLR 235; (ix) Haryana State Co­operative Supply Marketing Federation Ltd. Vs. Sanjay 2009 LLR 1014; (x) The Range Forest Officer Vs. S. T. Harimani 2002 LLR 339; (xi) Bank of Baroda, Kota Vs. PO, CGIT cum Labour Court, Kota & Anr. 2011 (1) LLJ 462 and (xii) Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Krishna Pal 2007 LLR 76 (Delhi HC).
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 19 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document

D.G.M.,Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. & ... vs Ilias Abdulrehman on 17 December, 2004

11. ARGUMENTS I have heard Sh. Ajit Singh Adv. for the workman and Sh. G. D. Maheshwari Adv. for the management. Ld. counsel for management filed written submissions and relied upon case laws (i) Ranip Nagar Palika Vs. Babuji Gabhaji Thakare and ors. 2009 LLR SC 215; (ii) State of Maharashtra Vs. Dattatray Digamber Birajdas 2007 LLR SC 1132; (iii) Surendranagar District Panchayat & Anr. Vs. Jethabhai Pitamberbhai 2006 LLR SC 250; (iv) Municipal Corporation, Faridabad Vs. Siri Niwas 2004 LLR SC 1022; (v) Hemraj Vs. Director Sericulture, Bhopal & Anr. 2008 LLR 332; (vi) Raj Rani Vs. GTB Hospital & Anr. 2005 LLR 250; (vii) Rajasthan Tourism Development Corp. Ltd. Vs. Intejam Ali Zafri 2006 LLR 942; (viii) DGM Oil & Natural Gas Corp. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Illias Abdulrehman 2005 LLR 235; (ix) Haryana State Co­operative Supply Marketing Federation Ltd. Vs. Sanjay 2009 LLR 1014; (x) The Range Forest Officer Vs. S. T. Harimani 2002 LLR 339; (xi) Bank of Baroda, Kota Vs. PO, CGIT cum Labour Court, Kota & Anr. 2011 (1) LLJ 462 and (xii) Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Krishna Pal 2007 LLR 76 (Delhi HC).
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 16 - Full Document

Haryana State Coop Supply Mkt Fed.Ltd vs Sanjay on 22 July, 2009

11. ARGUMENTS I have heard Sh. Ajit Singh Adv. for the workman and Sh. G. D. Maheshwari Adv. for the management. Ld. counsel for management filed written submissions and relied upon case laws (i) Ranip Nagar Palika Vs. Babuji Gabhaji Thakare and ors. 2009 LLR SC 215; (ii) State of Maharashtra Vs. Dattatray Digamber Birajdas 2007 LLR SC 1132; (iii) Surendranagar District Panchayat & Anr. Vs. Jethabhai Pitamberbhai 2006 LLR SC 250; (iv) Municipal Corporation, Faridabad Vs. Siri Niwas 2004 LLR SC 1022; (v) Hemraj Vs. Director Sericulture, Bhopal & Anr. 2008 LLR 332; (vi) Raj Rani Vs. GTB Hospital & Anr. 2005 LLR 250; (vii) Rajasthan Tourism Development Corp. Ltd. Vs. Intejam Ali Zafri 2006 LLR 942; (viii) DGM Oil & Natural Gas Corp. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Illias Abdulrehman 2005 LLR 235; (ix) Haryana State Co­operative Supply Marketing Federation Ltd. Vs. Sanjay 2009 LLR 1014; (x) The Range Forest Officer Vs. S. T. Harimani 2002 LLR 339; (xi) Bank of Baroda, Kota Vs. PO, CGIT cum Labour Court, Kota & Anr. 2011 (1) LLJ 462 and (xii) Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Krishna Pal 2007 LLR 76 (Delhi HC).
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Ranip Nagar Palika vs Babuji Gabhaji Thakore And Ors on 23 November, 2007

11. ARGUMENTS I have heard Sh. Ajit Singh Adv. for the workman and Sh. G. D. Maheshwari Adv. for the management. Ld. counsel for management filed written submissions and relied upon case laws (i) Ranip Nagar Palika Vs. Babuji Gabhaji Thakare and ors. 2009 LLR SC 215; (ii) State of Maharashtra Vs. Dattatray Digamber Birajdas 2007 LLR SC 1132; (iii) Surendranagar District Panchayat & Anr. Vs. Jethabhai Pitamberbhai 2006 LLR SC 250; (iv) Municipal Corporation, Faridabad Vs. Siri Niwas 2004 LLR SC 1022; (v) Hemraj Vs. Director Sericulture, Bhopal & Anr. 2008 LLR 332; (vi) Raj Rani Vs. GTB Hospital & Anr. 2005 LLR 250; (vii) Rajasthan Tourism Development Corp. Ltd. Vs. Intejam Ali Zafri 2006 LLR 942; (viii) DGM Oil & Natural Gas Corp. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Illias Abdulrehman 2005 LLR 235; (ix) Haryana State Co­operative Supply Marketing Federation Ltd. Vs. Sanjay 2009 LLR 1014; (x) The Range Forest Officer Vs. S. T. Harimani 2002 LLR 339; (xi) Bank of Baroda, Kota Vs. PO, CGIT cum Labour Court, Kota & Anr. 2011 (1) LLJ 462 and (xii) Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Krishna Pal 2007 LLR 76 (Delhi HC).
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 49 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Surendranagar District Panchayat vs Dahyabhai Amarsinh on 25 October, 2005

Also, Hon'ble Supreme Court in case law reported as Surenderanagar District Panchayat Vs. Dahyabhai Amarsinh AIR 2006 SC 110 held that "...... To attract provisions of Section 25F, the workman claiming protection under it, has to prove that there exists relationship of employer and employee; that he is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act; the establishment in which he is employed is an industry within the meaning of the Act and he must have put in not less than one year of continuous service as defined by Section 25B under the employer. These conditions are cumulative. If any of these conditions are missing the provisions of Section 25F will not attract. To get relief from the court the workman has to establish that he has right to continue in service and that his service has been terminated without complying with the provisions of Section 25F of the Act.....". Thus, it is for the workman to prove that he completed not less than one year of continuous service with the management to show compliance with one of the requirements of section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 300 - P P Naolekar - Full Document
1   2 Next