Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.19 seconds)

K.C. Bhargava vs The State Of M.P on 17 July, 2012

12 Under the provisions of Clause (c) of sub-rule (5) of Rule 14 of M.P. Civil Services ( Classification, Control and Appeal ) Rules, 1966, it is the duty of the department to appoint Inquiry Officer and Presenting Officer to prove the charges against the delinquent. In the present case, admittedly, Presenting Officer was not appointed and only Enquiry Officer was appointed, who acted as Presenting Officer and Enquiry Officer as well, therefore, the entire inquiry has been conducted in violation of Rule 14 of CCA Rules, 1966 . This Court in the case of K.C. Bhargava Vs. State of M.P. and another reported in [ 2012(4) MPLJ 244 ] has held that due to non-appointment of Presenting Officer, entire inquiry vitiates. Para 9 is reproduced below :
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 4 - K K Trivedi - Full Document
1