Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.24 seconds)Section 19 in The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 [Entire Act]
Ram Moorat Tiwari vs State Of Chhattisgarh 32 Wpc/2486/2018 ... on 24 October, 2018
At the first place, if it was a Permanent Lok Adalat,
which passed the award, it ought not to have entertained an
application seeking partition decree on the basis of compromise,
which is certainly not a public utility service. Secondly, the
Court takes judicial notice of the fact that there was no
Permanent Lok Adalat in the district of Siwan and there has
been, in fact, no such Permanent Lok Adalat established in
accordance with the provisions under Section 22-B of the Act,
by issuance of requisite notice. I reiterate the view taken on this
point in case of Dhirendra Pratap Singh vs. Ravi Kant Singh,
reported in 2014(2) PLJR 619.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
1