Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 32 (0.28 seconds)The Delhi Excise Act, 2009
Article 15 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 23 in The Delhi Excise Act, 2009 [Entire Act]
The Indian Medical Council Act, 1956
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 30 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 6 in Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Act, 1998 [Entire Act]
The State Of Maharashtra vs Indian Medical Association & Ors on 6 December, 2001
"However, a proper reading of paragraph 68, indicates
that a further distinction has been made between
minority and non minority professional colleges. It is
provided that in cases of non minority professional
colleges "a certain percentage of seats" can be
reserved for admission by the management. The rest
have to be filled up on basis of counseling by State
agencies. The prescription of percentage has to be
done by the Government according to local needs.
Keeping this in mind provisions have to be made for the
poorer and backward sections of the society. It must be
remembered that, so far as, medical colleges are
concerned, an essentiality certificate has to be obtained
before the college can be set up. It cannot be denied
that whilst issuing the essentiality certificate the
respective State Governments take into consideration
the local needs. These aspects have been highlighted in
a recent decision of this Court in State of Maharashtra
v. Indian Medical Assn. Whilst granting the essentiality
certificate the State Government undertakes to take
over the obligations of the private educational
institution in the event of that institution becoming
incapable of setting of the institution or imparting
education therein. A reading of paragraphs 59 and
68 shows that in non minority professional
colleges admission of students, other than the
percentage given to the management, can only be
on the basis of merit as per the common entrance
tests conducted by government agencies. The
manner in which the percentage given to the
management can be filled in is set out hereinafter."
Aiims Employees Union & Ors. vs Aiims & Ors. on 2 February, 1999
It appears the
learned Judge was not appraised with the judgment of the Supreme
Court in AIIMS Students Union (supra).