Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)V.Devan vs The Tahsildar on 22 December, 2020
9.In another order passed by this Court on 22.12.2020 in WP No.15403
of 2020 (V. Devan vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Chennai) this
Court, in para No.7 held that the respondents are not justified in denying the
legal heirship certificate of late. Periyamadasamy Konar only on the ground
that he did not have direct heirs. It is rather unfortunate that even inspite of the
several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to issue
legal heir certificate for the Class II heirs also, the respondents have chosen to
rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and have been rejecting such
applications.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
R.Lokesh Kannan vs The District Collector on 21 June, 2017
6.In view of the above facts, this writ petition is disposed
of directing the petitioner to submit a fresh application to the
second respondent enclosing this order copy and the orders
passed in the writ petition referred above, within a period of
two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
Section 8 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
The Registration Of Births And Deaths Act, 1969
1