Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.22 seconds)Section 106 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
T. Dakshinamoorthy vs Thulja Bai And Anr. on 9 November, 1951
P.W. 2 also says that from the date of letting out of the premises, he does not know whether a business was conducted in the petition-mentioned premises. As against this, we have the assertion of R.W. 1 that the petitioner rented out the premises only for non-residential purposes, that he is doing business ever since he became a tenant, that there are no residential houses in the street in which the petition-mentioned premises is situate, that there is no well, kitchen or bath-room in the petition-mentioned premises and that the assertion that the petitioner is in requirement of the premises for his residence is not true. Having these facts in mind, we have to come to the conclusion whether the premises is a residential building or a non-residential building. This Court in a decision reported in Dakshinamoorthy v. Thulja Bai , observed thus:
Section 21 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
1