Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.15 seconds)

Vannarakkal Kallalathil Sreedharan vs Chandramaath Balakrishnan And Anr on 6 March, 1990

7] To substantiate this submission, learned counsel for the Appellant has relied upon the judgment of the Karnataka High Court in the case of Sri.D.L. Sridhar Vs. Sri.C.R. Chandramohan & Anr., ILR 2008 KAR 591, wherein the reliance was placed on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of V. Sreedharan Vs. C. Balakrishnan & Anr., 1990(3) SCC 291, in which, it was held that, Contractual obligation created by the pre-attachment document will prevail over the attachment order. It was held that, if the purchaser had already perfected his title, then it has to be held that, that title will prevail over the order of attachment which is passed subsequently.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 63 - K J Shetty - Full Document

Sri D.L. Sridhar S/O Late D. Lakshmana ... vs Sri C.R. Chandramohan S/O Sri C.Y. ... on 27 March, 2007

7] To substantiate this submission, learned counsel for the Appellant has relied upon the judgment of the Karnataka High Court in the case of Sri.D.L. Sridhar Vs. Sri.C.R. Chandramohan & Anr., ILR 2008 KAR 591, wherein the reliance was placed on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of V. Sreedharan Vs. C. Balakrishnan & Anr., 1990(3) SCC 291, in which, it was held that, Contractual obligation created by the pre-attachment document will prevail over the attachment order. It was held that, if the purchaser had already perfected his title, then it has to be held that, that title will prevail over the order of attachment which is passed subsequently.
Karnataka High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 5 - K Ramanna - Full Document
1