Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)Sita Ram Bhau Patil vs Ramchandra Nago Patil (Dead) By L. Rs. & ... on 20 January, 1977
(b) Sita Ram Bhau Patil v Ramchandra Nago Patil
(1977) 2 SCC 49
"13. Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act states
that "An admission is a statement, oral or
documentary, which suggests any inference as to
any fact in issue or relevant fact, and which is
made by any of the persons, and under the
Page 25 of 32
RP No.6 of 2014 in Appeal No.44 of 2013
circumstances, hereinafter mentioned". In regard
to dispute between the Appellant and the
Respondent arising out of Surveys Nos. 194/15
and 200/29, Survey Nos. 201/2 and 194/13 were
neither issues in fact nor relevant fact."
I.S.Sikandar (D) By Lrs.& Ors vs K.Subramani & Ors on 29 August, 2013
(b) MANU/SC/1093/2013 I S Sikandar (D) by L.Rs.
Vs K Subramani and Ors
"As could be seen from the prayer sought for in the
original suit, the Plaintiff has not sought for declaratory
relief to declare the termination of Agreement of Sale
as bad in law. In the absence of such prayer by the
plaintiff, the original suit filed by him before the trial
court for grant of decree for specific performance in
Page 21 of 32
RP No.6 of 2014 in Appeal No.44 of 2013
respect of the suit schedule property on the basis of
Agreement of Sale and consequential relief of decree
for permanent injunction is not maintainable in law."
Section 58 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Article 5 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1