Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)Pannalal vs State Of Bombay And Ors on 11 February, 1963
In Pannalal v. State of Bombay , it was held that the wide wording of Order 41, Rule 33, C.P.C., empowers the appellant Court to make whatever order it thinks fit, not only as between the appellant, and the respondent, but also as between a respondent and a respondent. It was also held that it is only in exceptional cases, that an abjection under Order 41, Rule 22 can be directed against other respondents. The cross-objection now filed as would be seen later is entertained only in respect of one item of properties and in such a case, it would be impossible to remand the matter for fresh consideration, and therefore, this cross-objection as filed is maintainable.
1