Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.24 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Air Force Act, 1950
Uma Shanker Pathak vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 24 November, 1988
In Uma Shanker Pathak vs. UOI & Ors. 1989 (3)
SLR 405 Allahabad High Court had occasion to deal with
this question and held that :-
Shri Sukhbir Singh & Anr. vs Union Of India & Anr. on 15 April, 2009
In this behalf,
reference can be usefully made to the previous
pronouncements of this court including the judgment dated 3rd
August, 2010 in W.P.(C) No. 2683/1992 entitled Shri Sukhbir
Singh Vs. Union of India and others and the judgment
dated 31st May, 2010 in WP (C) No.236/2000 entitled
Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India & Ors. The several
binding judicial on the issue were considered and had been
held as follows:-
Section 20 in The Border Security Force Act, 1968 [Entire Act]
Ex. Naik Subhash Chander vs Union Of India & Ors. on 8 September, 2008
In the decision dated 8th September, 2008 in W.P.(C)
No.6036/2005 Ex. Naik Subhash Chander Vs. UOI &
Ors. this court had occasion to test the propriety and
legality of a record of a summary security force court
which is identical to that in the present case. Ex Naik
Subhash Chander was tried for committing an offence
under section 20 of the BSF Act. The plea of guilt against
the petitioner had been recorded in identical terms. The
observations of the court can also be usefully extracted
and read as follows:-
Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh vs Union Of India & Ors. on 31 May, 2010
In this behalf,
reference can be usefully made to the previous
pronouncements of this court including the judgment dated 3rd
August, 2010 in W.P.(C) No. 2683/1992 entitled Shri Sukhbir
Singh Vs. Union of India and others and the judgment
dated 31st May, 2010 in WP (C) No.236/2000 entitled
Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India & Ors. The several
binding judicial on the issue were considered and had been
held as follows:-
The Chief Of The Army Staff And Ors. vs No. I133883630-K Ex. Sep. Dvr. (Mt) ... on 11 September, 2006
64. Our attention has also been drawn to the judgment of
this court dated 17th January, 2008, passed in LPA No.
254/2001 entitled The Chief of Army Staff & Ors. Vs.
Ex. 14257873 K. Sigmm Trilochan Behera, wherein
the court had occasion to consider the case where plea of
guilt of the respondent was recorded on a printed format.
The court deprecated the non-recording of complete plea
W.P.(C)No.14098/2009 Page 8 of 17
which was not signed by the respondents as well. This
case had also arisen in the context of recording of a plea
of guilty by a court martial under the Army Act and in a
similar situation, the court observed as under.
Sukanta Mitra vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 3 May, 2007
63. On this very issue, in MANU/JK/0017/2007 : 2007
(2) JKJ 197 Sukanta Mitra Vs. Union of India & Ors.,
the court observed as follows:-
1