Harish @ Harish Chandra vs State Of C.G. 11 Cra/2788/1999 Ravindra ... on 20 November, 2019
An affidavit dated 01.02.2011 (Ex.PW6/2) was executed in the said regard
by the defendant. However, on 26.03.2011, the defendant served a legal
notice upon the plaintiff, on false and frivolous grounds, in order to usurp
the amount of sale consideration paid to him. On 28.04.2011, the plaintiffs
went to the office of Sub-Registrar for the execution and registration of
3 of 11
::: Downloaded on - 24-07-2022 09:58:00 :::
RSA-186-2021 (O&M) -4-
sale-deed along with balance sale consideration and necessary amount for
stamp papers etc., but the defendant did not show up. After getting their
presence marked by way of an affidavit dated 28.04.2011, in support of
their bona fides, plaintiffs sent a reply dated 07.06.2011 to the legal notice
sent by the defendants. The defendant then filed a false rent petition titled as
'Harish Vs. Gaurav Gupta' before the Rent Controller, Panchkula. The
plaintiffs alleged that not only had the defendant played a fraud upon them
regarding which a criminal complaint was also filed, but he had also failed
to perform his part of the agreement to sell and thus, cheated them by not
executing the sale-deed, even after receiving Rs.10,75,000/-, out of the total
sale consideration of Rs.13,50,000/-.