Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.27 seconds)
Ganesan vs The Tahsildar on 22 March, 2022 cites

Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Gurnam Kaur on 12 September, 1988

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.16264 of 2021 ''7. The Government in fact, exercising the power conferred upon him by Section 83 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994, has issued a notification in G.O.Ms.No.225 Rural Development (C1) Department dated 15.10.1996 appointing the President of the panchayat as executive authority to exercise the powers and perform the functions of the executive authority of that village panchayat. Admittedly, the said G.O. was not brought to the notice of the earlier Division Bench. Had it been brought to its notice, the decision of the Division Bench would have been otherwise. The Honourable Supreme Court has observed in the case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Gurnam Kaur MANU/SC/0323/1988 :AIR1989SC38, as follows:
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 817 - A P Sen - Full Document

A.P.Sundari vs ) The District Collector on 4 July, 2019

8. Again referring to yet another unreported judgment of the Division Bench of this court in the case of Sundari Vs. The District Collector and others reported in (2007) 6 MLJ 399 submitted that this Court has rightly considered the similar argument advanced by the petitioner and answered the contentions against the petitioner therein that the Government in fact exercising the power conferred under Section 83 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 has issued a Notification in G.O.Ms.No.225 Rural Development (C1) Department dated 15.10.1996 thereby appointing the President of the panchayat as Executive Authority to exercise the powers and perform the functions of the executive authority of that village panchayat. We find merits on theses submissions. Let us also see what is per incurium from paragraph 7 of the above decision extracted here under :
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 3 - K R Baabu - Full Document
1