Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.70 seconds)The Sale Of Goods Act, 1930
Section 18 in The Sale Of Goods Act, 1930 [Entire Act]
Juggernath Augurwallah vs E.A. Smith And Co. And Anr. on 21 February, 1906
There was an appeal against this judgment which came up before a Special Bench whose judgment was reported in -- 'Juggcrnath Augurwallah v. E, A. Smith', 34 Cal 173 (H). The passage from the judgment of Sale J. which we have extracted above was quoted with approval by Maclean C. J., and was made the basis of the affirmance. This decision therefore cannot help the Government in their contention that the property in the goods passed to the buyer before they reached the customs frontier at Cochin.
Section 2 in The Sale Of Goods Act, 1930 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Sale Of Goods Act, 1930 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Sale Of Goods Act, 1930 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in The Sale Of Goods Act, 1930 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Sale Of Goods Act, 1930 [Entire Act]
State Of Travancore-Cochin And Others vs Shanmugha Vilas Cashew Nut Factoryand ... on 8 May, 1953
26. It is unnecessary to consider the further contention raised on behalf of the petitioners that as in the present case the transfer of property was effected only by the delivery of the bills of lading when the goods represented by them were already on the high-seas, the transaction was clearly a sale in the course of export specifically referred to by the Supreme Court in the second Travancore case (A).