Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.28 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Hem Raj & Ors vs State Of Haryana on 29 March, 2005
In light of the above-discussed discrep-
ancies in the testimony of PW-1, the same is a serious infirmity in the case of the
prosecution, Reliance in this regard is placed on Hem Raj & Ors. Vs. State of
Haryana 2005 AIR (SC) 2110:
Keki Hormusji Gharda & Ors vs Mehervan Rustom Irani & Anr on 13 May, 2009
26. The word "voluntary" is significant. As observed in Keki Hormusji Gharda v.
Mehervan Rustom Irani, (2009) 6 SCC 475 the same connotes that obstruction
should be direct. The obstructions must be a restriction on the normal movement
of a person. It should be a physical one. They should have common intention to
cause obstruction.
S. L. Goswami vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 January, 1972
30. Reliance in this regard is placed on S.L.Goswami v. State of M.P, 1972
CRI.L.J.511(SC) wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that:-