Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 38 (0.54 seconds)The Delhi Rent Act, 1995
Section 15 in The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 [Entire Act]
Addanki Narayanappa & Anr vs Bhaskara Krishtappa And 13 Ors on 21 January, 1966
In this context, reliance can also be placed upon a judgment
of this Court in Addanki Narayanappa v. Bhaskara Krishnappa,
1966 SCC OnLine SC 6 in which this Court has held that irre-
spective of the character of the property, when it is brought in by
the partner when the partnership is formed, it becomes a property
of the partnership firm, by virtue of Section 14 of Partnership Act.
This Court held as follows:
Section 25 in The Delhi Rent Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 116 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Delhi Rent Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Shiv Sarup Gupta vs Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta on 30 July, 1999
69.It is trite that tenant cannot dictate the landlord as to what is adequate
and landlord is the best judge of his requirements. It is a settled law that
mere availability of other alternate accommodation is itself not the
decisive factor for denial of eviction proceedings by the landlord, more
so, since there are various factors like the size, location, access, purpose,
viability, safety concerns, football, and/or like, amongst others which
have/ are to be taken into consideration while dealing with the aspect of
availability of alternate suitable accommodation. Reliance is placed
upon case titled as Shiv Sarup Gupta v Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta [(1999)
6 SCC 222].