Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (1.14 seconds)
Inderjeet Singh vs Harish Chandra Bhutani on 6 July, 2012 cites

Siddalingamma And Anr vs Mamtha Shenoy on 18 October, 2001

In Siddalingamma & Anr. Vs. Mamtha Shenoy(2001) 8 SCC 431, the Hon'ble Supreme Court while considering the reasonable and bona fide requirement of landlord held that the question to be asked by a judge of facts, by placing himself in the place of the landlord , is, whether in the given facts proved by the material on record the need to occupy the premises can be said to be natural, real, sincere and honest. If the answer be in the positive, the need is bona fide.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 187 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Precision Steel And Engineering Works ... vs Prem Deva Niranjan Deva Tayal on 7 October, 1982

In Precision Steel & Engineering Works & Anr. Vs. Prem Devi Niranjan Deva Tayal (1982) 3 SCC 270, the Apex Court has held that the prayer for leave to contest should be granted to the tenant only where a prima facie case has been disclosed by him. In the absence of the tenant having disclosed a prima facie case i.e. such facts as to what disentitles the landlord from obtaining an order of eviction, the Court should not mechanically and in routine manner grant leave to defend.
Supreme Court of India Cites 41 - Cited by 614 - D A Desai - Full Document
1