Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.23 seconds)Section 23 in The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Rajnesh vs Neha on 4 November, 2020
Learned counsel for the opposite party opposed the prayer as aforesaid and contended that in this case the learned trial court has directed the revisionist to file an affidavit in compliance of observations made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajnesh vs. Neha and another (2021) 2 SCC 324 for making assessment of his income for the purpose of deciding the application u/s 23 of the aforesaid Act. There is no any illegality in this regard. So far as the prayer for summoning the son of opposite party no.2 is concerned, he is not party to the complainant, therefore, his summoning cannot be claimed by the revisionist. Learned trial court has rejected the application filed by the revisionist rightly. There is no illegality or impropriety in the orders passed by learned trial court as well as by the learned appellate court but this revision being devoid of merit is liable to be dismissed.
Nirmala Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh 40 Wps/432/2017 ... on 18 May, 2018
This criminal revision has been filed with prayer to allow the revision and set aside the impugned order dated 25.06.2025 passed by learned Additional Session Judge, Court No.19, Kanpur Nagar in Criminal Appeal No.15 of 2025 (Gopal Verma vs. State of U.P. and another) as well as order dated 13.12.2024 passed by Judicial Magistrate IX, Kanpur Nagar by which the learned Magistrate has rejected the application dated 13.11.2024 filed by the revisionist in Complaint Case No.4401/2021 (Saroj Verma vs. Gopal Verma and others) under Section 12 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
Ram Gopal Verma vs State Of U.P. And Another on 20 January, 2021
This criminal revision has been filed with prayer to allow the revision and set aside the impugned order dated 25.06.2025 passed by learned Additional Session Judge, Court No.19, Kanpur Nagar in Criminal Appeal No.15 of 2025 (Gopal Verma vs. State of U.P. and another) as well as order dated 13.12.2024 passed by Judicial Magistrate IX, Kanpur Nagar by which the learned Magistrate has rejected the application dated 13.11.2024 filed by the revisionist in Complaint Case No.4401/2021 (Saroj Verma vs. Gopal Verma and others) under Section 12 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
1