Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (1.42 seconds)Section 28 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Ambya Kalya Mhatra(D) By Lrs.& Ors vs State Of Maharashtra on 12 September, 2011
In the case of Ambya Kalya Mhatra (supra), the Full Bench
of the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that, the Act does not require
land owner to specify the amount claimed if the objection to the
award is that it is not fair or inadequate. It is the duty of the
Court to grant fair and adequate compensation. Even if the
15 of 18
16 FA 2201-2016.odt
amount is not stated or higher amount is claimed, the Court still
has the power to enhance the amount more than the amount
claimed by the claimant.
Navanath & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra on 15 April, 2009
7. The learned advocate for the appellants relies upon the
judgment in the case of Navanath & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra
reported in 2009 (4) AIR Bom R 492. Much emphasis are given
by the learned advocate for the appellants on this judgment with
respect to his submission about determination of compensation of
the lands on the basis of capitalization in respect of the fruit
bearing tress.
The Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... vs P. Veerabhadarappa Etc. Etc on 9 January, 1984
8. His further reliance is on the judgment in the case of Special
Land Acquisition Officer, Davangere Vs. P. Veerabhadarappa
reported in AIR 1984 SC 774. In this judgment also, the Hon'ble
Apex Court has considered that the multiplier to be adopted for
the fruit bearing trees should be eight.
Mehrawal Khewaji Trust(Regd) ... vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 27 April, 2012
In view of the judgments in the cases of Mehrawal Khewaji
Trust (supra) and Chindha Fakira Patil (supra), this Court has not
hesitation in accepting that the fair and adequate compensation to
be Rs. 4000/- per R plus 15% rise at the rate of Rs. 10% rise per
year would be Rs. 4600/-.
M.S.N. Nadaf (Deceased) By L.Rs And Ors. vs Special Land Acquisition Officer on 16 October, 2003
11. Somewhat similar view is taken in the judgment in the case
of Chindha Fakira Patil (D) through L.Rs. Vs. The Special Land
Acquisition Officer reported in AIR 2012 SC 481. The rate was
reduced of the compensation considering the average value of sale
instances. It is held that, no reduction of market value could have
been done.
Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Balwan Singh And Ors. vs Land Acquisition Collector And Ors. on 8 August, 2007
14. So far as interest from the date of award or from the date of
possession is concerned, the respondents relied upon the
judgment in the case of Balwan Singh and Ors. Vs. Land
Acquisition Collector and Anr. reported in AIR 2016 SC 1565. [ It
is held that, the claimant shall be entitled to additional interest by
way of damages at the rate of 15% per annum from the date of
dispossession till the date of notification under section 4(1) of the
Act.