Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)
Sujit Pal vs Prabir Kumar Sun And Ors. on 2 September, 1985 cites

The State Of Bihar vs Rani Sonabati Kumari on 20 September, 1960

7. It is now a well-settled principle of law that when there is a specific provision in the Code in respect of any mailer, it is not permissible for the Court to pass any order in respect of such matter under Section 151 of the Code. Much reliance has been placed on behalf of the petitioner upon a decision of the Supreme Court in State of Bihar v. Rani Sonabati Kumari, . In that case, it has been held by the Supreme Court that though undoubtedly proceedings under Order 39, Rule 2(3) of the Civil P.C. (which is somewhat similar to the amended provision of Order 39, Rule 2A) have a punitive aspect, as is evident from the contemner being liable to be ordered to be detained in civil prison, they are in substance designed to effect the enforcement of or to execute the order.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 169 - N R Ayyangar - Full Document

Bhagat Singh Bugga vs Dewan Jagbir Sawhney on 28 January, 1941

In laying down the said proposition the Supreme Court has, amongst others, relied upon the decision in Bhagat Singh's case (AIR 1941 Cal 670) (supra). The Supreme Court has also reiterated that the provisions of the Code are not exhaustive, for the simple reason that the Legislature is incapable of contemplating all the possible circumstances which may arise in future litigation and consequently for providing the procedure for them.
Calcutta High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 273 - Full Document

Magna And Anr. vs Rustam And Anr. on 8 February, 1961

12. The view which we take finds support from a decision of the Rajasthan High Court in Magna v. Rustam, . In that case, it has been observed that though Order 39, Rule 2(3) of the Code is exhaustive on the subject of imposing of penalty on the party guilty of disobedience, it does not provide any relief to the party in whose favour the order of temporary injunction is passed.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 25 - Full Document
1