Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)

Sh. Subhash Chand S/O Sh. Prabhu Dayal vs Sh. Rulda Singh S/O Sh. Niranjan Singh ... on 12 February, 2007

that the disability has to be taken with respect to the whole body and cited judgment of our own High Court titled as Subhash Chand v. Rulda Singh 2007 II AD (DELHI) 636. It was held that the disability certificate was granted for giving benefit to handicap persons and disability of 25% was given. The tribunal had taken the same as 10% disability to the whole body. The order was upheld by our own High Court.
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 9 - V B Gupta - Full Document

Sunil Kumar vs Ram Singh Gaud & Ors on 2 November, 2007

He also cited Sunil Kumar v. Ram Singh Gaud and Ors. 2008 (1) T.A.C. 9 (S.C.). In the said case the petitioner had suffered three fracture including tibia. He was examined by the board of doctor, who was given 45% permanent disability. In the said case, the percentage of disability was taken as 45% in the case of the driver and assessed. The same was upheld by Hon'ble Supreme Court. However Hon'ble Supreme Court reduced 1/3 of the same on account of personal expenses.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 37 - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Kusum Rai & Ors on 24 March, 2006

24. Ld. Counsel on behalf of insurance company cited National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kusum Rai and Others, 2006 ACJ 1336, judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court wherein the driver has licence to drive light motor vehicle but he was driving a jeep which was being plied as taxi, a commercial vehicle. The court held that there was breach of terms and conditions of the contract and driver did not posses a valid driving licence to drive a commercial vehicle and therefore, insurance company may recover the same from the owner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 535 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1