Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.31 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 62 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Article 19 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 13 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Hari Vishnu Kamath vs Syed Ahmad Ishaque And Others on 9 December, 1954
In the case of -- 'Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmad Ishaque', 1955 SC 233 ((S) AIR V 42) (D), it was observed by the Supreme Court at page 243 as follows :
Kunwar Sri Tri Vikram Narain Singh vs The Government Of The State Of Uttar ... on 9 March, 1956
In a recent case of this Court -- 'Sri Vikram Narain Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 1956 All 564 (AIR V 43) (E), the State Government had stopped the payment of certain pension to the petitioner and a direction was issued by this Court restraining the opposite party, the State of Uttar Pradesh, from withholding the payment of the amount of pension. In effect jt was a direction to the State Government to pay the amount to the petitioner. In my opinion, therefore, there is no bar for this Court to issue a direction, in the circumstances of this case, to the Regional Transport Authority to grant a permit to the petitioner.
Moti Lal And Ors. vs The Government Of The State Of Uttar ... on 11 May, 1950
In the case of -- 'Moti Lal v. The Govt. of the State of Uttar Pradesh', 1951 All 257 (AIR V 38) (FB) (C), it was held by a Full Bench of this Court that the conditions for the grant or refusal o permits are to be found in Section 47 and the discretion o the Regional Transport Authority in granting or refusing a permit is to be exercised in accordance with the provisions of Section 47. In that case, during the pendency of the applications for the renewal of permanent permits, the State Government decided to run State buses on certain routes.
1