Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.26 seconds)The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
The Banking Regulation Act, 1949
Section 191 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 372 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Smt. Sarabati Devi & Anr vs Smt. Usha Devi on 6 December, 1983
7. Of course, as observed by the court below, while interpreting the nominee's interest, the Supreme Court had held, in Sarbati Devi v. Usha Devi , that amounts received under a policy when the assured died intestate shall be subject to the claim of the heirs of the assured under the Law of Succession. Naming a nominee therefore was not equivalent to conferment of a status as heir or a legatee.
The Indian Succession Act, 1925
The Insurance Act, 1938
Section 30 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
M. Saraswathy Amma vs P. Padmavathy Amma And Ors. on 23 July, 1992
The court below had also adverted to two other judgments of this Court in Bhaskaran v. Kalliani 1990 (2) KLT 749 and Saraswathi Amma v. Padmavathi Amma 1992 (2) KLT 276, which were cases under the Family Welfare Benefits Scheme. The principle was that nominee was only a trustee competent to act on behalf of legal heirs and the right of legal heirs were not extinguished because of such nomination.
1